ARINC 640:1997
ARINC 640:1997 Resolution Of Inservice Anomalies Through Asapp Intended to reduce costs to airlines, airframe manufacturers and aircraft systems suppliers by removal of anomalous behavior from aircraft systems in a timely manner.
Table of Contents
1.0INTRODUCTION1.1Purpose
1.2Objective
2.0DEFINITIONS
3.0APPROACHANDRATIONALE
3.1ProcesstoDetectanAnomaly
3.1.1AnomalousBehaviorAddresses
3.1.2DetectionMechanism
3.2ProcesstoCollectDataandAnomalies
3.3ProcesstoIsolateanAnomaly
3.4ProcesstoResolvetheAnomaly
4.0AIRLINESINPUTSTOPROBLEM
4.1General
4.2DescriptionofProblem
4.2.1AirlineDataSupportRequirements
4.3ImpactonAirline
4.3.1AirlinePriority
5.0AIRFRAMEMANUFACTURER'SREQUIREMENTSFORASOLUTION
5.1Participation
5.1.1DataAnalysis
5.1.2ProblemSelection
5.2Data
5.3Testing
5.4ProblemCorrection
5.5InterimProcedures
6.0AIRCRAFTSYSTEMSMANUFACTURER'SREQUIREMENTSFORA
SOLUTION
6.1Participation
6.2Data
6.3Testing
6.4ProblemCorrection
6.5InterimProcedures
7.0PROCESSTODETECTANDCORRECTANOMALIES
7.1Purpose
7.2ProcessOverview
7.3AnomalyDetectionProcess
7.3.1CentralDataBase
7.3.1.1ReportingFormat
7.3.1.2AirlineDataReportingFrequency
7.3.1.3AirlineUnitsBeingReported
7.3.1.4EstablishingIndustryNFFRate
7.3.1.5DeterminingaReportedSystem's
NFFRate
7.3.2ReportingPotentialAnomalies
7.4DefininganAnomaly
7.4.1AirlineInternalReview
7.4.1.1GatheringofAdditionalData
7.4.2AssemblingtheRT
7.4.2.1TeamMembers
7.4.3DefineanActionPlan
7.4.4ExecutetheActionPlan
7.4.5DistributeResultsofTests
7.4.6RefinetheHypothesis
7.5AnomalyCorrectionPhase
7.5.1TeamMakeup
7.5.2TestDevelopment
7.5.4AnomalyWork-Around
7.5.5CorrectionProcess
7.5.6TestingandRecertification
7.5.7CorrectAccomplishmentandFinalActions
7.6ConfirmationofNFFResolution
8.0COSTJUSTIFICATIONFORSOLUTION
8.1Purpose
8.2NFFAnomalyCostEvaluation
8.2.1ResourceRequirements
8.2.2CDAAdministrationandManagement
8.3CorrectionProcessCostEvaluationandJustification
8.3.1CostofResolution1